Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we hereby DENY the petition for its failure to show any reversible error in the assailed Decision dated December 28, 2007 and Resolution dated April 11, 2008 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 94673, both of which we hereby AFFIRM .
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we hereby DENY the petition for its failure to show any reversible error in the assailed Decision dated December 28, 2007 and Resolution dated April 11, 2008 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 94673, both of which we hereby AFFIRM . Costs against the petitioners. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 157483 - SPOUSES CARLOS AND JUANITA SURIA, VS. HEIRS OF BRIGIDO M. TOMOLIN, NAMELY: DAMIANA T. PEREZ AND LUCRESIA T. DECLARO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 157483 -
CaseG.R. NO. 155359 - SPOUSES PONCIANO AYA-AY, SR. AND CLEMENCIA AYA-AY, VS. ARPAPHIL SHIPPING CORP., AND MAGNA MARINE, INC.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 155359 -
CaseG.R. NO. 162580 - ELMAR O. PEREZ, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH DIVISION, TRISTAN A. CATINDIG AND LILY GOMEZ-CATINDIG. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 162580 -