Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant petition is hereby GRANTED. The Order dated 25 May 1998 issued by respondent Department of Agrarian Reform as well as the Resolution dated 31 January 2000 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the said Order are hereby NULLIFIED and SET ASIDE and a new one is entered, declaring the subject landholdings of petitioner situated at Pinugay, Baras, Rizal, exempted from the CARP coverage, considering that it was declared a security zone under P.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant petition is hereby GRANTED. The Order dated 25 May 1998 issued by respondent Department of Agrarian Reform as well as the Resolution dated 31 January 2000 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the said Order are hereby NULLIFIED and SET ASIDE and a new one is entered, declaring the subject landholdings of petitioner situated at Pinugay, Baras, Rizal, exempted from the CARP coverage, considering that it was declared a security zone under P.D. [No.] 1845, as revised by P.D. [No.] 1848. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 169277 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, [1] REPRESENTED BY OIC -SECRETARY NASSER C. PANGANDAMAN, VS. VICENTE K. UY. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 169277 -
CaseG.R. No. 158228 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, AS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ROBERTO M. PAGDANGANAN, VS. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, CULTURE AND SPORTS (DECS).
G.R. No. 158228 -
CaseG.R. No. 170018 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, REPRESENTED BY OIC-SECRETARY NASSER C. PANGANDAMAN, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS AND BASILAN AGRICULTURAL TRADING CORPORATION (BATCO).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 170018 -