Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing considerations, the Court finds ¾ 1. In Criminal Case No. 89-73804 ¾ the accused, ELESEO CHENG and SALVADOR SIOCO, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of MURDER, as defined and penalized under Article 248, Paragraph 1, Revised Penal Code, and as charged in the aforequoted information and, accordingly, hereby sentences each of them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua with the accessory penalties provided by law, both to pay, subsidiarily an…
WHEREFORE, in the light of the foregoing considerations, the Court finds ¾ 1. In Criminal Case No. 89-73804 ¾ the accused, ELESEO CHENG and SALVADOR SIOCO, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of MURDER, as defined and penalized under Article 248, Paragraph 1, Revised Penal Code, and as charged in the aforequoted information and, accordingly, hereby sentences each of them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua with the accessory penalties provided by law, both to pay, subsidiarily and jointly; to the heirs of Esperanza Viterbo represented by her mother, Esperanza Viterbo, Sr., the amount of FIFTY THOUSAND PESOS ( P 50,000.00) as civil indemnification and the additional amount of TEN THOUSAND PESOS ( P 10,000.00) as moral damages, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency; and each to pay one-third (1/3) of the costs. 2. In Criminal Case No. 89-73805 ¾ the accused, ELESEO CHENG and SALVADOR SIOCO, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of MURDER, as defined and penalized under Article 248, Paragraph 1, Revised Penal Code, and as charged in the aforequoted information and, accordingly, hereby sentences each of them to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua with the accessory penalties provided by law and each to pay one-third (1/3) of the costs. Because no heir/relative of the deceased, Yehia Aburawash Mohammed was presented to testify on the civil aspect of the case, the Court reserves to his heirs the right to file suit for civil indemnification and/or damages. Finally, in the service of their sentences, the two accused aforenamed shall be credited with the full time during which they underwent preventive imprisonment provided they voluntarily agreed in writing to abide by the same disciplinary rules imposed upon convicted prisoners; otherwise, they shall be credited to only four-fifths (4/5) thereof (Article 29, Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 6127). 3. In both Criminal Cases Nos. 89-73804 & 89-73805 ¾ the Court finds the accused, ALEJANDRO MALUBAY, NOT GUILTY of the crime of MURDER, as defined and penalized under Article 248, Paragraph 1, Revised Penal Code, and as charged in the aforequoted two informations and, accordingly, hereby ACQUITS him thereof for insufficiency of evidence, with one-third (1/3) costs de oficio in these two cases. The Prison Officer, City Jail of Manila is ordered immediately upon receipt of a copy of this Decision, to release from his custody the person of accused Alejandro Malubay unless there is other legal ground or cause for his further detention. SO ORDERED.
G.R. Nos. 204481-82 - ALBERT G. AMBAGAN, JR., VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 204481-82 -
CaseG.R. No. 124572 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. CIRILO OPOSCULO, JR. ALIAS "BONG", JAIME BARIL ALIAS "METONG", WILFREDO BARACAS ALIAS "ADIONG,"ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 124572 -
CaseG.R. No. 121769 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. DANDY ALVAREZ Y FRANCISCO @ DANDY ANGELIO AND EDUARDO VILLAS @ EDDIE, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 121769 -