Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 137000 -

G.R. No. 137000 - CIRILO R. VALLES, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND ROSALIND YBASCO LOPEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

En Banc

Cited Laws

RA 8171RA 292,RA 248RA 7160RA 7160,RA 7854,RA 703
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered and there being no new matters and issues tendered, We find no convincing reason or impressive explanation to disturb and reverse the Resolutions promulgated by this Commission in EPC 92-54 and SPA. 95-066. This Commission RESOLVES as it hereby RESOLVES to DISMISS the present petition. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, premises considered and there being no new matters and issues tendered, We find no convincing reason or impressive explanation to disturb and reverse the Resolutions promulgated by this Commission in EPC 92-54 and SPA. 95-066. This Commission RESOLVES as it hereby RESOLVES to DISMISS the present petition. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

VS. THE HON. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND MR. NEIL M. ALVAREZ.

G.R. No. 151914 -

Case

VS. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, FELIPE A. YCOT AND DAISY LUMAMBAS. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 127456 -

Case

WALDEN F. BELLO AND LORETTA ANN P. ROSALES, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS.

G.R. No. 191998 -