Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , in light of the foregoing considerations, the Petition for Review is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. The instant Petition for Review filed thereto is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Decision dated April 8, 2010 and the Resolution dated June 3, 2010 of the Court in Division in CTA Case No. 7769 are hereby AFFIRMED as to result only.
WHEREFORE , in light of the foregoing considerations, the Petition for Review is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. The instant Petition for Review filed thereto is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Decision dated April 8, 2010 and the Resolution dated June 3, 2010 of the Court in Division in CTA Case No. 7769 are hereby AFFIRMED as to result only. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 222476 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, VS. YUMEX PHILIPPINES CORPORATION.
G.R. No. 222476 -
CaseG.R. No. 186223 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, VS. PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATED SMELTING AND REFINING CORPORATION.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 186223 -
CaseG.R. NO. 145526 - ATLAS CONSOLIDATED MINING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 145526 -