Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered this Court finds accused Pablito Tambis y Baliong, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder. The Court observes that the manner in which he executed the crime shocks the sensibilities of normal people as it was done beyond the norms of behavior in a peaceful and civil society. As such, the offense committed by the accused would qualify as a heinous crime (as defined by R.A.
WHEREFORE, premises considered this Court finds accused Pablito Tambis y Baliong, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder. The Court observes that the manner in which he executed the crime shocks the sensibilities of normal people as it was done beyond the norms of behavior in a peaceful and civil society. As such, the offense committed by the accused would qualify as a heinous crime (as defined by R.A. No. 7659) as the act was grievous, odious, atrocious, perverse, repugnant, and outrageous to the common standards of "decency and morality in a just, civilized, and orderly society." "The Court further observed throughout the proceedings, the hateful and angry eyes of the accused which shows that he poses a continuous threat, danger, and menace to society. In view hereof, this Court hereby resolves to impose upon the accused the maximum penalty (under Section 6 of the said Heinous Crime Act) of death. The accused is further ordered to indemnify the heirs of the victim the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as death indemnity and Twenty Eight Thousand Pesos (P28,000.00) for actual damages. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 125318 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. HILARIO REBAMONTAN ALIAS “AYONG,” ACCUSED-. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 125318 -
CaseG.R. No. 130598 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. BENITO MIER Y VISTAL, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 130598 -
CaseG.R. No. 123969 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. ROGELIO TAVAS ALIAS “BOTOG”, ACCUSED-. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 123969 -