Back to Search
JurisprudenceA.M. No. RTJ-03-1755

A.M. No. RTJ-03-1755 - JUDGE SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN (RET.), COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE AMALIA F. DY, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 213, MANDALUYONG CITY.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 597RA 121RA 723RA 235RA 5RA 88,RA 423RA 654,RA 719
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , in view of all the foregoing, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , in view of all the foregoing, the complaint is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-15-2423 - SANTIAGO D. ORTEGA, JR., COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE ROGELIO LL. DACARA, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 37, IRIGA CITY, CAMARINES SUR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-15-2423

Case

A.M. No. MTJ-03-1506 (A.M. OCA-IPI No. 01-995-MTJ) - PABLO B. MABINI, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE LORINDA B. TOLEDO-MUPAS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, DASMARIÑAS, CAVITE.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. MTJ-03-1506

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-10-2236 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. NO. 09-3083-RTJ) - RUBEN N. SALCEDO, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE GIL G. BOLLOZOS.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-10-2236