Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED and the challenged Resolutions of January 24, 1992 and April 24, 1992 are AFFIRMED; but the respondent Sandiganbayan is DIRECTED to order the Office of the Ombudsman to forthwith conduct a proper preliminary investigation of the charges embodied in the informations filed against petitioner; to suspend the proceedings pending termination thereof; and thereafter to take action on petitioner's cases as may be warranted by the results of said preliminary investigati…
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED and the challenged Resolutions of January 24, 1992 and April 24, 1992 are AFFIRMED; but the respondent Sandiganbayan is DIRECTED to order the Office of the Ombudsman to forthwith conduct a proper preliminary investigation of the charges embodied in the informations filed against petitioner; to suspend the proceedings pending termination thereof; and thereafter to take action on petitioner's cases as may be warranted by the results of said preliminary investigation. IT IS SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 154155 - THE OMBUDSMAN, VS. BEN C. JURADO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 154155 -
CaseG.R. No. 193964 -
G.R. No. 193964 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 236177-210 - JOAN V. ALARILLA, VS. THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN(FOURTH DIVISION) AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 236177-210 -