Back to Search
JurisprudenceA.C. No. 13678

A.C. No. 13678 (Formerly CBD Case No. 18-5805) - EHRENFREL C. AZARRAGA, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. EDUARDO L. JALBUNA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 10173RA 10173,RA 6085,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, the undersigned finds that the three respondents Atty. Eduardo Jalbuna, Atty. Jade Villanueva and Atty. Arthur Lastimoso have violated and/or committed acts in violation of their duties and responsibilities as commissioned Notaries Public.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, the undersigned finds that the three respondents Atty. Eduardo Jalbuna, Atty. Jade Villanueva and Atty. Arthur Lastimoso have violated and/or committed acts in violation of their duties and responsibilities as commissioned Notaries Public. Accordingly, each of them should be sanctioned as follows: Respondent Atty. Eduardo Jalbuna, while he has no intention to renew his commission as Notary Public, is hereby suspended or disqualified from being commissioned as Notary Public for a period of two (2) years effective from date of receipt of this Order for violation of Section (b-2 and 3) and Section 2 (a-1 to 6) Rule VI, 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice. x x x x All other respondents are also warned that repetition of similar infractions or any other violation of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice will be subject of a more severe sanction. SO ORDERED.