Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff [private respondent Salazar] and against the defendant [petitioner BPI] and ordering the latter to pay as follows: The amount of P267,707.70 with 12% interest thereon from September 16, 1991 until the said amount is fully paid; The amount of P30,000.00 as and for actual damages; The amount of P50,000.00 as and for moral damages; The amount of P50,000.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff [private respondent Salazar] and against the defendant [petitioner BPI] and ordering the latter to pay as follows: The amount of P267,707.70 with 12% interest thereon from September 16, 1991 until the said amount is fully paid; The amount of P30,000.00 as and for actual damages; The amount of P50,000.00 as and for moral damages; The amount of P50,000.00 as and for exemplary damages; The amount of P30,000.00 as and for attorneys fees; and Costs of suit. The counterclaim is hereby ordered DISMISSED for lack of factual basis. The third-party complaint [filed by petitioner] is hereby likewise ordered DISMISSED for lack of merit. Third-party defendants [i.e., private respondent Templonuevos] counterclaim is hereby likewise DISMISSED for lack of factual basis. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 116181 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND CARMELO H.
G.R. No. 116181 -
CaseVS. COURT OF APPEALS, NINEVETCH
G.R. No. 112212 -
CasePENTA CAPITAL FINANCE CORPORATION, VS. THE HONORABLE TEODORO BAY, PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, QUEZON CITY, BRANCH 86; ANGELITO ACOSTA, DEPUTY SHERIFF OF RTC QC BRANCH 86; BIBIANO REYNOSO IV, AND COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION OF QUEZON CITY.
G.R. No. 162100 -