TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the Petition for Review is GRANTED . The Decision dated 31 May 2007 and Resolution dated 24 July 2007 in CA-G.R. CV No.
WHEREFORE , the Petition for Review is GRANTED . The Decision dated 31 May 2007 and Resolution dated 24 July 2007 in CA-G.R. CV No. 82053 of the Court of Appeals, as well as the Orders dated 11 March 2003 and 19 September 2003 issued by the Regional Trial Court, Makati City, Branch 134, are REVERSED and SET ASIDE . The Complaint in Civil Case No. 01-1567 is hereby REINSTATED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 160446 - RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION, VS. DOLORES HILARIO, TERESITA HILARIO, THELMA HILARIO OCHOA AND EDUARDO HILARIO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 160446 -
CaseG.R. No. 217744 - JOSE Z. MORENO, V. RENE M. KAHN, CONSUELO MORENO KAHN-HAIRE, RENE LUIS PIERRE KAHN, PHILIPPE KAHN, MA. CLAUDINE KAHN MCMAHON, AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF MUNTINLUPA CITY.
G.R. No. 217744 -
CaseG.R. No. 119580 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND LAPAZ KAW NGO.
G.R. No. 119580 -