Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition for review in G.R. No. 175677 is DENIED for lack of merit.
WHEREFORE , the petition for review in G.R. No. 175677 is DENIED for lack of merit. Petitioner's motion for reconsideration in G.R. No. 177133 is DENIED for lack of merit. Costs against petitioners in both petitions. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 161776 - ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION AND PACITA UY, VS. SPOUSES DAVID E. ESERJOSE AND ZENAIDA ESERJOSE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 161776 -
CaseG.R. NO. 153171 - SPOUSES RODOLFO CARPIO AND REMEDIOS ORENDAIN, VS. RURAL BANK OF STO. TOMAS (BATANGAS), INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 153171 -
CaseG.R. NO. 164036 - SPOUSES SANTIAGO AND MA. CONSUELO CARLOS, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 204, AT MUNTINLUPA CITY, AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 164036 -