Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, and in consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant: "1) Ordering the defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Six Hundred Pesos (P150,600.00) and Fifty Thousand (P50,000.00) Pesos as compensatory damages; "2) Ordering the defendant to pay to plaintiff the sum of Five Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) as attorney's fees and Two Thousand Pesos (P2,000.
WHEREFORE, and in consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant: "1) Ordering the defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Six Hundred Pesos (P150,600.00) and Fifty Thousand (P50,000.00) Pesos as compensatory damages; "2) Ordering the defendant to pay to plaintiff the sum of Five Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) as attorney's fees and Two Thousand Pesos (P2,000.00) as litigation expenses; and "3) To pay the cost of the suit. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 142571 - NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION, VS. LEONCIO C. ENCISO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 142571 -
CaseG.R. No. 190957 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, VS. APAC MARKETING CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY CESAR M. ONG, JR.. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 190957 -
CaseG.R. No. 106804 - NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND ANTONINO POBRE.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 106804 -