Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 118904 -

VS. COURT OF APPEALS, FELIX TRINIDAD (DECEASED) AND LOURDES TRINIDAD

Cited Laws

RA 118RA 849,RA 322RA 31RA 266,RA 425,RA 555,RA 337,RA 773,RA 675,RA 132,RA 55RA 230RA 532RA 353,RA 259,RA 701,RA 321,RA 684,RA 175,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, the Court REVERSES the appealed decision. In lieu thereof, the Court hereby DISMISSES the [petitioner’s] complaint and the counterclaim thereto. Without costs.” Respondent Court denied reconsideration in its impugned Resolution which reads: [10] “The Court DENIES defendants-appellants’ motion for reconsideration, dated December 15, 1994, for lack of merit.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, the Court REVERSES the appealed decision. In lieu thereof, the Court hereby DISMISSES the [petitioners] complaint and the counterclaim thereto. Without costs. Respondent Court denied reconsideration in its impugned Resolution which reads: [10] The Court DENIES defendants-appellants motion for reconsideration, dated December 15, 1994, for lack of merit. There are no new or substantial matters raised in the motion that merit the modification of the decision. Hence, this petition. [11] The Facts The assailed Decision recites the factual background of this case, as follows: [12] On August 10, 1978, plaintiff [herein petitioner] filed with the Court of First Instance of Aklan, Kalibo, Aklan, an action for partition of four (4) parcels of land, described therein, claiming that he was the son of the late Inocentes Trinidad, one of three (3) children of Patricio Trinidad, who was the original owner of the parcels of land. Patricio Trinidad died in 1940, leaving the four (4) parcels of land to his three (3) children, Inocentes, Lourdes and Felix. In 1970, plaintiff demanded from the defendants to partition the land into three (3) equal shares and to give him the one-third (1/3) individual share of his late father, but the defendants refused. In their answer, filed on September 07, 1978, defendants denied that plaintiff was the son of the late Inocentes Trinidad. Defendants contended that Inocentes was single when he died in 1941, before plaintiffs birth. Defendants also denied that plaintiff had lived with them, and claimed that the parcels of land described in the complaint had been in their possession since the death of their father in 1940 and that they had not given plaintiff a share in the produce of the land. Patricio Trinidad and Anastacia Briones were the parents of three (3) children, namely, Inocentes, Lourdes and Felix. When Patricio died in 1940, survived by the above named children, he left four (4) parcels of land, all situated at Barrio Tigayon, Kalibo Aklan. Arturio Trinidad, born on July 21, 1943, claimed to be the legitimate son of the late Inocentes Trinidad. Arturio got married in 1966 to Candelaria Gaspar, at the age of twenty three (23). Sometime after the marriage, Arturio demanded from the defendants that the above-mentioned parcels of land be partitioned into three (3) equal shares and that he be given the one-third (1/3) individual shares of his late father, but defendants refused. In order to appreciate more clearly the evidence adduced by both parties, this Court hereby reproduces pertinent portions of the trial courts decision: [13] EVIDENCE FOR THE PLAINTIFF: Plaintiff presented as his first witness, Jovita Gerardo, 77 years old, (at the time she testified in 1981) who is the barangay captain of barrio Tigayon, Kalibo, Aklan, since 1972. She testified that before being elected as barrio captain she held the position of barrio council-woman for 4 years. Also she was [a member of the] board of director[s] of