Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiffs ordering defendant JAL to pay plaintiffs as follows: the sum of US$800.00 representing the expenses incurred at the Narita Airport with interest at 12% per annum from March 27, 1992 until the sum is fully paid; the sum of P200,000.00 for each plaintiff as moral damages; the amount of P100,000.00 for each plaintiff as exemplary damages; the amount of P100,000.
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiffs ordering defendant JAL to pay plaintiffs as follows: the sum of US$800.00 representing the expenses incurred at the Narita Airport with interest at 12% per annum from March 27, 1992 until the sum is fully paid; the sum of P200,000.00 for each plaintiff as moral damages; the amount of P100,000.00 for each plaintiff as exemplary damages; the amount of P100,000.00 as attorneys fees; and costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 123560 - SPOUSES YU ENG CHO AND FRANCISCO TAO YU, VS. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., TOURIST WORLD SERVICES, INC., JULIETA CANILAO AND CLAUDIA TAGUNICAR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 123560 -
CaseG.R. No. 170141 - JAPAN AIRLINES, VS. JESUS SIMANGAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 170141 -
CaseG.R. No. 150843 - CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD., VS. SPOUSES DANIEL VAZQUEZ AND MARIA LUISA MADRIGAL VAZQUEZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 150843 -