Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds accused, Andres T. Melencion, GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt, for Violation of Section 3, paragraph e of R.A. No.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds accused, Andres T. Melencion, GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt, for Violation of Section 3, paragraph e of R.A. No. 3019, as amended, otherwise known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, in relation to Section 9(a), therefore, and applying Act No. 4103, as amended, otherwise known as the Indeterminate Sentence law, the Court imposes upon accused the penalty of imprisonment ranging from 6 years and one month as minimum to ten years and one day as maximum, to further suffer perpetual disqualification from public office, and to indemnify the complainants: Hideliza Tabanao, Elvira Joyohoy, Angelito Pableo, Lucia Gako, Zosimo Villarino, Cirila Sabanal, Vivencia Evelyn Lauron, Zenaida Mantos, Olympia Gelardino and Emma Pableo the sum of P6,978.00 each; Primitivo Jimeno the sum of P4,336.00; Visitacion Gocotano the sum of P10,424.00 and Frisco Canumay the sum of P6,834.00 or a total of P91,374.00 plus 12% legal interest per annum from January 1985 to July 1989 or in the amount of P49,341.96. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 146234 - TOLENTINO MENDOZA AND SALOME MADAMBA, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES AND SANDIGANBAYAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 146234 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 239523-33 - MANUEL S. SATUITO, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.[G.R. No. 239542 and G.R. Nos. 239554-61]MEINRADO ENRIQUE A. BELLO, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.[G.R. Nos. 239657-68]MINVILUZ S. CAMIÑA, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 239523-33 -
CaseG.R. No. 238282 - JOSEPH T. SORIANO, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 238282 -