Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered ordering the respondent Bright Maritime Corporation to pay the complainant Ricardo Fantonial the peso equivalent at the time of actual payment of US$ 2,680.00. The other claims and the case against respondent Desiree P. Tenorio are dismissed for lack of merit.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered ordering the respondent Bright Maritime Corporation to pay the complainant Ricardo Fantonial the peso equivalent at the time of actual payment of US$ 2,680.00. The other claims and the case against respondent Desiree P. Tenorio are dismissed for lack of merit. [8] Petitioners appealed the decision of the Labor Arbiter to the NLRC. On May 31, 2001, the NLRC, Fourth Division, rendered a Decision [9] reversing the decision of the Labor Arbiter. The dispositive portion of the NLRC decision reads: WHEREFORE, premises considered, the decision of Labor Arbiter Ernesto F. Carreon, dated 25 September 2000, is SET ASIDE and a new one is entered DISMISSING the complaint of the complainant for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 196122 - JOEL B. MONANA, VS. MEC GLOBAL SHIPMANAGEMENT AND MANNING CORPORATION AND HD HERM DAVELSBERG GMBH.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 196122 -
CaseG.R. NO. 152039 - F.F. MARINE CORPORATION AND/OR MR. ERIC A. CRUZ, VS. THE HONORABLE SECOND DIVISION NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND RICARDO M. MAGNO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 152039 -
CaseG.R. No. 124927 - MORE MARITIME AGENCIES, INC., OCEAN BULK MARITIME, AND ALPHA INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC., VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND SERGIO F. HOMICILLADA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 124927 -