Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. The Decision of 28 September 1995 of the Court of Appeals affirming the 20 June 1990 judgment of the RTC- Br. 61, Makati City, ordering petitioner Rodolfo P. Velasquez and Mariano N.
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. The Decision of 28 September 1995 of the Court of Appeals affirming the 20 June 1990 judgment of the RTC- Br. 61, Makati City, ordering petitioner Rodolfo P. Velasquez and Mariano N. Canilao, Jr. to solidarily pay respondent Philippine Commercial and Industrial Bank (PCIB) the amount of P7,227,624.48 with annual interest of 17% and attorney's fees of P700,000.00 plus costs of suit as well as its Resolution of 19 February 1995 denying reconsideration, is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 153784 - ROMEO C. CADIZ, CARLITO BONGKINGKI AND PRISCO GLORIA IV, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, AND PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (NOW EQUITABLE PCIBANK).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 153784 -
CaseTEOFILA ILAGAN-MENDOZA and ROSARIO ILAGAN URCIA, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, CALATAGAN RURAL BANK, INC., GEMINIANO T. NOCHE, as President of Calatagan Rural Bank, and REMEDIOS DE CLARO and EDMUNDO RODRIGUEZ, as Sheriffs.
G.R. No. 171374 -
CaseG.R. No. 155943 - PILAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES PEPITO L. NG AND VIOLETA N. NG, AND SPOUSES ANTONIO V. MARTEL, JR. AND JULIANA TICSON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 155943 -