Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. Accordingly, the Decision dated July 25, 2012 and the Resolution dated September 25, 2012 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No.
WHEREFORE , the petition is DENIED. Accordingly, the Decision dated July 25, 2012 and the Resolution dated September 25, 2012 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 96528 are hereby AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 198402 - HEIRS OF PACENCIA RACAZA, NAMELY, VIRGINIA RACAZA COSCOS, ANGELES RACAZA MIEL, RODRIGO RACAZA, QUIRINO RACAZA, ROGELIO RACAZA, ERNESTA RACAZA AND ROLAND RACAZA, VS. SPOUSES FLORENCIO ABAY-ABAY, AND ELEUTERIA ABAY-ABAY,[1].R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 198402 -
CaseG.R. No. 162930 - LAGRIMAS DE JESUS ZAMORA, VS. SPOUSES BEATRIZ ZAMORA HIDALGO MIRANDA AND ARTURO MIRANDA, ROSE MARIE MIRANDA GUANIO, MARY JULIE CRISTINA S. ANG, JESSIE JAY S. ANG, JASPER JOHN S. ANG AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR DAVAO CITY.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 162930 -
CaseG.R. No. 190143 - SPOUSES LOLITA ORENCIA AND PEDRO D. ORENCIA, VS. FELISA CRUZ VDA. DE RANIN, REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, MRS. ESTELA C. TANCHOCO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 190143 -