TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the Court resolves to: NOTE the Report and Recommendation dated January 14, 2013 of the Office of the Bar Confidant; SUSPEND from the practice of law for a period of one (1) year Atty. Artemio V. San Juan for violating his Lawyer’s Oath and Rules 18.03 and Rule 18.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the Court resolves to: NOTE the Report and Recommendation dated January 14, 2013 of the Office of the Bar Confidant; SUSPEND from the practice of law for a period of one (1) year Atty. Artemio V. San Juan for violating his Lawyers Oath and Rules 18.03 and Rule 18.04, Canon 18 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, with a WARNING that the commission of the same or similar act or acts shall be dealt with more severely; and DENY the motion filed by Atty. Artemio V. San Juan in the letter dated August 28, 2012 that he be allowed to return to the practice of law. Let copies of this Decision be furnished to all courts. The Office of the Bar Confidant is instructed to include a copy of this Decision in Atty. San Juans file. SO ORDERED.
A.C. NO. 6192 (FORMERLY CBD 02-947) - HEIRS OF THE LATE HERMAN REY ROMERO, REPRESENTED BY ARACELI VDA. DE ROMERO, COMPLAINANTS, VS. ATTY. VENANCIO REYES JR..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. NO. 6192
CaseA.C. NO. 3569 - FIDELA VDA. DE ENRIQUEZ, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. MANUEL G. SAN JOSE. RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. NO. 3569
CaseA.C. No. 11078 - VERLITA V. MERCULLO AND RAYMOND VEDANO, COMPLAINANTS, VS. ATTY. MARIE FRANCES E. RAMON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.C. No. 11078