Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered, as follows: 1. In Criminal Case No. 7693, accused(s) Jomar Sisracon y Rupisan, Mark Valderama y Rupisan, Roberto Cortez y Badilla, Luis Padua y Mitra and Adonis Motil y Golondrina are hereby found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Qualified Rape as defined and penalized under Art. 266-A, par.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered, as follows: 1. In Criminal Case No. 7693, accused(s) Jomar Sisracon y Rupisan, Mark Valderama y Rupisan, Roberto Cortez y Badilla, Luis Padua y Mitra and Adonis Motil y Golondrina are hereby found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Qualified Rape as defined and penalized under Art. 266-A, par. 1 in relation to Art. 266-B, 2 nd par. of the Revised Penal Code as amended by R.A. 8353 and in further relation of Sec. 5 of R.A. 8369, and sentencing each of them to suffer the penalty of Reclusion Perpetua and to indemnify [the] victim [AAA] the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity; Seventy-Five Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00) as moral damages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as exemplary damages. 2. In Criminal Case No. 7694, accused(s) Mark Valderama y Rupisan, Roberto Cortez y Badilla, Luis Padua y Mitra, Adonis Motil y Golondrina and Jomar Sisracon y Rupisan, are hereby found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Qualified Rape as defined and penalized under Art. 266-A, par. 1 in relation to Art. 266-B, 2 nd par. of the Revised Penal Code as amended by R.A. 8353 and in further relation of Sec. 5 of R.A. 8369, and sentencing each of them to suffer the penalty of Reclusion Perpetua and to indemnify [the] victim [AAA] the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity; Seventy-Five Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00) as moral damages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as exemplary damages. 3. In Criminal Case No. 7695, accused(s) Roberto Cortez y Badilla, Luis Padua y Mitra, Adonis Motil y Golondrina, Jomar Sisracon y Rupisan and Mark Valderama y Rupisan are hereby found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Qualified Rape as defined and penalized under Art. 266-A, par. 1 in relation to Art. 266-B, 2 nd par. of the Revised Penal Code as amended by R.A. 8353 and in further relation of Sec. 5 of R.A. 8369, and sentencing each of them to suffer the penalty of Reclusion Perpetua and to indemnify [the] victim [AAA] the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity; Seventy-Five Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00) as moral damages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as exemplary damages. 4. In Criminal Case No. 7696, accused(s) Luis Padua y Mitra, Adonis Motil y Golondrina, Jomar Sisracon y Rupisan, Mark Valderama y Rupisan and Roberto Cortez y Badilla, are hereby found GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of Qualified Rape as defined and penalized under Art. 266-A, par. 1 in relation to Art. 266-B, 2 nd par. of the Revised Penal Code as amended by R.A. 8353 and in further relation of Sec. 5 of R.A. 8369, and sentencing each of them to suffer the penalty of Reclusion Perpetua and to indemnify [the] victim [AAA] the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as civil indemnity; Seventy-Five Thousand Pesos (P75,000.00) as moral damages; and Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000.00) as exemplary damages. 5. In Criminal Ca
G.R. No. 231984 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. LEO IBAÑEZ Y MORALES, ACCUSED-APELLANT.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 231984 -
CaseG.R. No. 254254 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. XXX,[1] ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 254254 -
CaseG.R. No. 241248 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, VS. RENATO DE GUZMAN, ROMEO CABICO, MICHAEL DOMINGO, RENELITO VALDEZ, BRINGLE BALACANAO AND BOBOY TAMONANG, ACCUSED. MICHAEL DOMINGO AND BRINGLE BALACANAO, ACCUSED-.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 241248 -