Back to Search
JurisprudenceA.M. NO. MTJ-05-1587

A.M. NO. MTJ-05-1587 [FORMERLY IPI NO. 04-1588-MTJ] - PILAR BARREDO-FUENTES, LOURDES J. ESTRELLADO, CLARITA ESTRELLADO-MAINAR, AND FLORENDA ESTRELLADO-DIAZ, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE ROMEO C. ALBARRACIN, MTCC, BRANCH 3, DAVAO CITY.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 1RA 597RA 75
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, we modify the conclusion reached by the OCA. The administrative case filed against Judge Romeo C. Albarracin is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, we modify the conclusion reached by the OCA. The administrative case filed against Judge Romeo C. Albarracin is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1476 (A.M. OCA-IPI No.98-480-MTJ) - BENITO ANG, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE REINATO G. QUILALA, CLERK OF COURT ZENAIDA REYES-MACABEO AND CLERK III LOUIE MACABEO, METC, MANILA.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1476

Case

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1860 - SPOUSES FLORENCIO & ESTHER CAUSIN, COMPLAINANTS, VS. JUDGE LEONARDO N. DEMECILLO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 24, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY. RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. RTJ-04-1860

Case

A.M. No. MTJ-04-1523 (formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 99-780-MTJ) - DARIO MANALASTAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE RODRIGO R. FLORES, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 2, SAN FERNANDO, PAMPANGA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

A.M. No. MTJ-04-1523