Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we MODIFY the decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals dated February 13, 2006 and May 2, 2006, respectively, in CA-G.R. SP No. 78933.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, we MODIFY the decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals dated February 13, 2006 and May 2, 2006, respectively, in CA-G.R. SP No. 78933. Respondent Mary Ann. T. Castro is declared guilty of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service and is suspended from service for six (6) months and one (1) day. SO ORDERED.
A.M. No. P-13-3155 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 10-3530-P) - JOEFIL BAGUIO, COMPLAINANT, VS. MARIA FE V. ARNEJO.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
A.M. No. P-13-3155
CaseG.R. No. 161629 - ATTY. RONALDO P. LEDESMA, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. ANIANO A. DESIERTO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS OMBUDSMAN, HON. ABELARDO L. APORTADERA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ASSISTANT OMBUDSMAN, AND OMBUDSMAN'S FACT FINDING AND INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR AGAPITO ROSALES.DECISION -
G.R. No. 161629 -
CaseA.M. No. P-98-1270 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 96-210-P) - ANTONIO ABANIL, COMPLAINANT, VS. ABEL FRANCISCO B. RAMOS, JR..
A.M. No. P-98-1270