Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition for review is GRANTED. The challenged Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.
WHEREFORE, the petition for review is GRANTED. The challenged Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 41860 are REVERSED. The complaint for expropriation filed before the trial court by respondent City of Pasig, docketed as SCA No. 873, is ordered DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 185740 - THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAMARINES NORTE, REPRESENTED BY GOVERNOR JESUS O. TYPOCO, JR., VS. BEATRIZ O. GONZALES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 185740 -
CaseG.R. NO. 153974 - MIGUEL BELUSO, NATIVIDAD BELUSO, PEDRO BELUSO, ANGELITA BELUSO, RAMON BELUSO, AND AMADA DANIEL, SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS REPRESENTED BY TERESITA ARROBANG, VS. THE MUNICIPALITY OF PANAY (CAPIZ), REPRESENTED BY ITS MAYOR, VICENTE B. BERMEJO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 153974 -
CaseG.R. Nos. 224438-40 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT (PCGG) AND MID-PASIG LAND DEVELOPMENT CORP., VS. AUGUSTUS ALBERT V. MARTINEZ, CITY GOLF DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND GEEK'S NEW YORK PIZZERIA, INC..DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. Nos. 224438-40 -