JurisprudenceG.R. No. 193919 -

G.R. No. 193919 - BIÑAN RURAL BANK, VS. JOSE WILLELMINO G. CARLOS AND MARTINA ROSA MARIA LINA G. CARLOS-TRAN, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, ATTY. EDWIN D. BALLESTEROS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 328,RA 693RA 564,RA 94,RA 348RA 73RA 148

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE, we DENY the petition for review on certiorari for lack of merit. The decision dated January 28, 2010 and resolution dated September 30, 2010 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE, we DENY the petition for review on certiorari for lack of merit. The decision dated January 28, 2010 and resolution dated September 30, 2010 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 109157 are hereby AFFIRMED . Costs against the petitioner. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 190144 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, VS. CARLITO LEE. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 190144 -

Case

G.R. No. 180945 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, AS THE ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF OPAL PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS (SPV-AMC), INC., VS. MERCEDES CORPUZ, REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY-IN-FACT VALENTINA CORPUZ. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 180945 -

Case

G.R. No. 119321 - CATALINO F. BAÑEZ AND ROMEO P. BUSUEGO, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND REPUBLIC PLANTERS BANK, REPUBLIC PLANTERS BANK.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 119321 -