TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the instant petition is GRANTED . The assailed Decision dated May 23, 2016 and the Resolution dated December 7, 2016 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the instant petition is GRANTED . The assailed Decision dated May 23, 2016 and the Resolution dated December 7, 2016 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 105749 are REVERSED and SET ASIDE . The Decision dated September 15,2015 of the Regional Trial Court is REINSTATED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 215759 - HEIRS OF ANDRES NAYA: TERESITA B. NAYA, NORMA N. ORBISO, CARMENCITA N. FERNAN, AND NARCISO P. NAYA, VS. ORLANDO P. NAYA AND SPOUSES HONESIMO C. RUIZ AND GLORIA S. RUIZ.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 215759 -
CaseG.R. No. 215761 - HEIRS OF TEOFILO PACAÑA AND PEREGRINA APOSTOL, NAMELY: OLGA A. PACAÑA, ESTER P. MARCAIDA, CARMELO P. MARCAIDA, JR., CARLO P. MARCAIDA, LIBERTY P. MARCAIDA, LANA M. MAGHIRANG, AND GRACE V. PACAÑA, VS. SPOUSES FLORENTINO MASALIHIT AND ANITA MASALIHIT.
G.R. No. 215761 -
CaseG.R. No. 185899 - SPOUSES REUBEN DELA CRUZ AND MINERVA DELA CRUZ, VS. RAMON C. PAPA IV, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CO-ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELA M. BUTTE. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 185899 -