Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, judgment is rendered for the defendant, and against the plaintiff: 1) Dismissing the complaint for lack of merit; 2) Declaring that the plaintiff was not entitled to the Writ of Replevin, issued on January 7,1985, and is now liable to the defendant for actual damages under the Replevin bond it filed; 3) On defendant's counter-claim, ordering the plaintiff to pay the defendant the sum of P400,000.00 as moral damages, P100,000.00 as exemplary damages, and P50,000.
WHEREFORE, judgment is rendered for the defendant, and against the plaintiff: 1) Dismissing the complaint for lack of merit; 2) Declaring that the plaintiff was not entitled to the Writ of Replevin, issued on January 7,1985, and is now liable to the defendant for actual damages under the Replevin bond it filed; 3) On defendant's counter-claim, ordering the plaintiff to pay the defendant the sum of P400,000.00 as moral damages, P100,000.00 as exemplary damages, and P50,000.00 as, and for, attorney's fees; 4) Ordering the plaintiff to return to the defendant the subject 1983 Ford Laser Sedan, with Motor or Serial No. SUNKBT-l4584, or its equivalent, in kind or value, in cash, as of this date, and to pay the costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 232798 - ADVAN MOTOR, INC., VS. LILA R. SAAVEDRA.
G.R. No. 232798 -
CaseG.R. No. 109966 - ELISCO TOOL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ROLANDO LANTAN, AND RINA LANTAN D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 109966 -
CaseG.R. No. 121559 - XENTREX AUTOMOTIVE, INC. VS. COURT OF APPEALS, MAC-ARTHUR M. SAMSON AND GERTRUDES C. SAMSON.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 121559 -