Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is DENIED . The assailed Decision dated July 23, 2003 as well as the Resolution dated July 9, 2004 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No, 76475 are AFFIRMED .
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is DENIED . The assailed Decision dated July 23, 2003 as well as the Resolution dated July 9, 2004 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No, 76475 are AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 203022 - ANTONIO MARTINEZ, VS. HON. RONALDO B. MARTIN, PRESIDING JUDGE AND ROLANDO PALMARES, DEPUTY SHERIFF, BOTH OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF ANTIPOLO CITY, BRANCH 73, AND NATALIA REALTY, INC..R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 203022 -
CaseG.R. No. 149243 - LOLITA B. COPIOSO, VS. LAURO, DOLORES, RAFAEL, ESTEBAN, AND CORAZON, ALL SURNAMED COPIOSO, AND COURT OF APPEALS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 149243 -
CaseG.R. NO. 156894 - GUILLERMO A. CRUZ, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS (FORMER FIFTEENTH DIVISION); REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, THIRD JUDICIAL REGION, BRANCH 38, LINGAYEN, PANGASINAN; SALVADOR C. VALLE AND CARMENCITA S. VALLE.
G.R. NO. 156894 -