Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, a decision is hereby issued declaring the dismissal of the remaining complainants illegal, and dismissing the complaint of the other (11) for having desisted on their complaints, and for lack of interest as regards Antonio Sicat. As a consequence, respondents A.C. Ordonez Construction, L.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, a decision is hereby issued declaring the dismissal of the remaining complainants illegal, and dismissing the complaint of the other (11) for having desisted on their complaints, and for lack of interest as regards Antonio Sicat. As a consequence, respondents A.C. Ordonez Construction, L.C. Ordonez Construction and L.C. Ordonez Gravel and Sand and Trucking and individual respondent Lamberto Ordonez are hereby ordered to pay complainants jointly and severally, including their separation the following amounts to which each of them are entitled, to wit: 1) Imelda Nicdao -------------------------- P 107,006.25 2) Rodrigo Sicat ---------------------------- P 93,083.23 3) Romeo Bautista -------------------------- P 72,149.95 All in the aggregate of two hundred seventy two thousand two hundred thirty nine pesos and 43/100 centavos (P272,293.43), plus attorney's fee representing ten (10%) percent of the total award, the rest being dismissed for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 156104 - R.P. DINGLASAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., VS. MARIANO ATIENZA AND SANTIAGO ASI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 156104 -
CaseG.R. NO. 165910 -
G.R. NO. 165910 -
CaseG.R. No. 177664 - CRC AGRICULTURAL TRADING AND ROLANDO B. CATINDIG, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND ROBERTO OBIAS.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 177664 -