Cited Laws
Accordingly, the Deputy Sheriff issued a Certificate of Redemption in favor of the spouses Litonjua dated March 31, 1981. [9] In a letter of the same date, the Deputy Sheriff informed L & R Corporation of the payment by PWHAS of the full redemption price and advised it that it can claim the payment upon surrender of its owner's duplicate certificates of title. [10] On April 2, 1981, the spouses Litonjua presented for registration the Certificate of Redemption issued in their favor to the Register of Deeds of Quezon City. The Certificate also informed L & R Corporation of the fact of redemption and directed the latter to surrender the owner's duplicate certificates of title within five days. [11] On April 22, 1981, L & R Corporation wrote a letter to the Sheriff, copy furnished to the Register of Deeds, stating: (1) that the sale of the mortgaged properties to PWHAS was without its consent, in contravention of paragraphs 8 and 9 of their Deed of Real Estate Mortgage; and (2) that it was not the spouses Litonjua, but PWHAS, who was seeking to redeem the foreclosed properties, when under Articles 1236 and 1237 of the New Civil Code, the latter had no legal personality or capacity to redeem the same. [12] On the other hand, on May 8 and June 8, 1981, the spouses Litonjua asked the Register of Deeds to annotate their Certificate of Redemption as an adverse claim on the titles of the subject properties on account of the refusal of L & R Corporation to surrender the owner's duplicate copies of the titles to the subject properties. With the refusal of the Register of Deeds to annotate their Certificate of Redemption, the Litonjua spouses filed a Petition [13] on July 17, 1981 against L & R Corporation for the surrender of the owner's duplicate of Transfer Certificates of Title No. 197232 and 197233 before the then Court of First Instance of Quezon City, Branch IV, docketed as Civil Case No. 32905. On August 15, 1981, while the said case was pending, L & R Corporation executed an Affidavit of Consolidation of Ownership. [14] Thereafter, on August 20, 1981, the Register of Deeds cancelled Transfer Certificates of Title No. 197232 and 197233 and in lieu thereof, issued Transfer Certificates of Title No. 280054 [15] and 28055 [16] in favor of L & R Corporation, free of any lien or encumbrance. With titles issued in its name, L & R Corporation advised the tenants of the apartments situated in the subject parcels of land that being the new owner, the rental payments should be made to them, and that new lease contracts will be executed with interested tenants before the end of August, 1981. [17] Upon learning of this incident from their tenants, the spouses Litonjua filed an adverse claim [18] and a notice of lis pendens [19] with the Register of Deeds. In the process, they learned that the prior sale of the properties in favor of PWHAS was not annotated on the titles issued to L & R. A complaint for Quieting of Title, Annulment of Title and Damages with prelim
G.R. No. 116220 -
G.R. No. 116220 -
CaseG.R. No. 203949 - SPOUSES GEORGE A. GALLENT, SR. AND MERCEDES M. GALLENT, VS. JUAN G. VELASQUEZ.[G.R. No. 205071] JUAN G. VELASQUEZ, VS. SPOUSES GEORGE A. GALLENT, SR. AND MERCEDES M. GALLENT.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 203949 -
CaseG.R. No. 176791 - COMMUNITIES CAGAYAN, INC., VS. SPOUSES ARSENIO (DECEASED) AND ANGELES NANOL AND ANYBODY CLAIMING RIGHTS UNDER THEM.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 176791 -