TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , the petition for review on certiorari is DENIED . The June 28, 2012 decision and the December 19, 2012 resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No.
WHEREFORE , the petition for review on certiorari is DENIED . The June 28, 2012 decision and the December 19, 2012 resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 119270 are AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 155943 - PILAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES PEPITO L. NG AND VIOLETA N. NG, AND SPOUSES ANTONIO V. MARTEL, JR. AND JULIANA TICSON.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 155943 -
CaseG.R. No. 185920 - JUANITA TRINIDAD RAMOS, ALMA RAMOS WORAK, MANUEL T. RAMOS, JOSEFINA R. ROTHMAN, SONIA R. POST, ELVIRA P. MUNAR, AND OFELIA R. LIM, VS. DANILO PANGILINAN, RODOLFO SUMANG, LUCRECIO BAUTISTA AND ROLANDO ANTENOR.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 185920 -
CaseG.R. No. 191699 - WILLIAM GO QUE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR WILLIAM GO QUE, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND DANNY SINGSON, RODOLFO PASAQUI,[1] LENDO LOMINIQUI,[2] AND JUN ANDALES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 191699 -