Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the Court DENIES the petition, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV 84792 with the MODIFICATION that respondents Marciana Paringit Bajit, Adolio Paringit, and Rosario Paringit Ordoño reimburse petitioners Felipe and Josefa Paringit of their corresponding share in the purchase price plus expenses advanced by petitioners amounting to P60,000.00 with legal interest from April 12, 1984 until fully paid.
WHEREFORE, the Court DENIES the petition, and AFFIRMS the decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV 84792 with the MODIFICATION that respondents Marciana Paringit Bajit, Adolio Paringit, and Rosario Paringit Ordoño reimburse petitioners Felipe and Josefa Paringit of their corresponding share in the purchase price plus expenses advanced by petitioners amounting to P60,000.00 with legal interest from April 12, 1984 until fully paid. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 234429 - SPOUSES FELIPE PARINGIT AND JOSEFA PARINGIT, VS. MARCIANA PARINGIT BAJIT, ADOLIO PARINGIT,* AND ROSARIO PARINGIT ORDOÑO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 234429 -
CaseG.R. NO. 153784 - ROMEO C. CADIZ, CARLITO BONGKINGKI AND PRISCO GLORIA IV, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, AND PHILIPPINE COMMERCIAL INTERNATIONAL BANK (NOW EQUITABLE PCIBANK).D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 153784 -
CaseG.R. No. 186322 - ENRICO S. EULOGIO AND NATIVIDAD V. EULOGIO, VS. PATERNO C. BELL, SR., ROGELIA CALINGASAN-BELL, PATERNO WILLIAM BELL, JR., FLORENCE FELICIA VICTORIA BELL, PATERNO FERDINAND BELL III, AND PATERNO BENERAÑO BELL IV.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 186322 -