Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered ordering the defendant [now respondent Leocadio] to partition only the property located at Maate, Famy, Laguna after plaintiff's [Tancredo's] reimbursement of the expenses incurred by the defendant in relation to the said lot. However, partition cannot be effected with regard to properties located at M. Calim Street, Famy, Laguna and the property located at Poroza, Famy, Laguna, as the same belong to the defendant.
accordingly rendered judgment as follows: WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered ordering the defendant [now respondent Leocadio] to partition only the property located at Maate, Famy, Laguna after plaintiff's [Tancredo's] reimbursement of the expenses incurred by the defendant in relation to the said lot. However, partition cannot be effected with regard to properties located at M. Calim Street, Famy, Laguna and the property located at Poroza, Famy, Laguna, as the same belong to the defendant. No pronouncement as to costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 120594 - ALFONSO TAN AND ETERIA TEVES TAN, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES CELESTINO U. TAN AND ROSARIO DY KUSHIN AND SPOUSES MAXIMO U. TAN AND TERESITA SY TAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 120594 -
CaseG.R. NO. 163081 - ANITA UNGAB-VALEROSO, JOINED IN BY HER HUSBAND, RUSELO VALEROSO, VS. AMANCIA UNGAB-GRADO, FELIX UNGAB, REPRESENTED BY HIS SON ROSENDO UNGAB, ESPENILA UNGAB-JAICTIN AND RUSTICINA UNGAB-TAMALA.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 163081 -
CaseSPS. IRENEO T. FERNANDO (SUBSTITUTED BY THEIR HEIRS, RONALDO M. FERNANDO, CONCORDIA FERNANDO-JAYME, ESMERALDA M. FERNANDO, ANTONETTE M. FERNANDO-REGONDOLA, FERDINAND M. FERNANDO, AND JEAN MARIE FERNANDO-CANSANAY), AND MONSERRAT MAGSALIN FERNANDO, VS. MARCELINO T. FERNANDO.
G.R. No. 191889 -