Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED . The Resolution of the Commission on Elections en banc dated August 3, 2005, denying reconsideration of the Resolution of the Commission on Elections First Division dated February 18, 2005, is AFFIRMED. No costs. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED . The Resolution of the Commission on Elections en banc dated August 3, 2005, denying reconsideration of the Resolution of the Commission on Elections First Division dated February 18, 2005, is AFFIRMED. No costs. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 188671 - MOZART P. PANLAQUI, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND NARDO M. VELASCO. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 188671 -
CaseG.R. NO. 165677 - EDILWASIF T. BADDIRI, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ALKADAR T. LOONG, NIJAR I. HASSAN AND THE PROVINCIAL BOARD OF CANVASSERS OF SULU.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 165677 -
CaseG.R. No. 199433 - ISABELITA P. GRAVIDES, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND PEDRO C. BORJAL.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 199433 -