Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 119252 -

VS. HON. APOLINARIO B. SANTOS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE

Cited Laws

RA 628RA 371RA 324RA 696RA 659RA 516RA 649RA 654,RA 511RA 236
Share:

Decision

Ruling

Accordingly, Mr. Hans Brumann, the owner of the establishment, signed a receipt for Goods, Articles, and Things Seized under Authority of the National Internal Revenue Code (dated August 17, 1988), acknowledging that the articles inventoried have been seized and left in his possession, and promising not to dispose of the same without authority of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue pending investigation. [3] 5. Subsequently, BIR officer Eliseo Corcega submitted to his superiors a report of the inventory conducted and a computation of the value-added tax and ad valorem tax on the articles for evaluation and disposition. [4] 6. Mr. Hans Brumann, the owner of the establishment, never filed a protest with the BIR on the preventive embargo of the articles. [5] 7. On October 17, 1988, Letter of Authority No. 0020596 was issued by Deputy Commissioner Eufracio D. Santos to BIR officers to examine the books of accounts and other accounting records of Hans Brumann, Inc., for stocktaking investigation for excise tax purposes for the period January 1, 1988 to present (Exhibit C). In a latter dated October 27, 1988, in connection with the physical count of the inventory (stocks on hand) pursuant to said Letter of Authority, Hans Brumann, Inc. was requested to prepare and make available to the BIR the documents indicated therein (Exhibit 'D'). 8. Hans Brumann, inc., did not produce the documents requested by the BIR. [6] 9. Similar Letters of Authority were issued to BIR officers to examine the books of accounts ans other accounting records of Miladay Jewels, Inc., Mercelles, Inc., Solid Gold International Traders, Inc., (Exhibit E, G and N) and Diagem Trading Corporation [7] for stocktaking/investigation for excise tax pirpose for the period January 1, 1988 to present. 10. In the case of Miladay Jewels, Inc. and Mercelles, Inc., there is no account of what actually transpired in the implementation of the Letters of Authority. 11. In the case of Solid Gold International Traders Corporation, the BIR officers made an inventory of the articles in the establishment. [8] The same is true with respect to Diagem Traders Corporation. [9] 12. On November 29, 1988, private respondents Antonio M. Marco and Jewelry By Marco & Co., Inc. filed with the Regional Trial Court, National Capital Judicial Region, Pasig City, Meto Manila, a petition for declaratory relief with writ of preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order against herein petitioners and Revenue Regional Director Felicidad L. Viray (docketed as Civil Case No. 56736) praying that Sections 126, 127(a) and (b) and 150 (a) of the National Internal Revenue Code and Hdg. No 71.01, 71.02, 71.03 and 71.04, Chapter 71 of the Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines be declared unconstitutional and void, and that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Customs be prevented or enjoined from issuing mission orders and other orders of similar nature. x x x 13. On February 9, 1989, herein petit