Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Ordering and directing the respondents, particularly respondent Manuel A. Torres, Jr., to turn over and deliver to TORMIL through its Corporate Secretary, Ma.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered as follows: 1. Ordering and directing the respondents, particularly respondent Manuel A. Torres, Jr., to turn over and deliver to TORMIL through its Corporate Secretary, Ma. Cristina T. Carlos: (a) the originals of the Deeds of Assignment dated July 13 and 24, 1984 together with the owners duplicates of Transfer Certificates of Title Nos. 374079 of the Registry of Deeds for Makati, and 41527, 41528 and 41529 of the Registry of Deeds for Pasay City and/or to cause the formal registration and transfer of title in and over such real properties in favor of TORMIL with the proper government agency; (b) all corporate books of account, records and papers as may be necessary for the conduct of a comprehensive audit examination, and to allow the examination and inspection of such accounting books, papers and records by any or all of the corporate directors, officers and stockholders and/or their duly authorized representatives or auditors; 2. Declaring as permanent and final the writ of preliminary injunction issued by the Hearing Panel on February 13, 1989; 3. Declaring as null and void the election and appointment of respondents to the Board of Directors and executive positions of TORMIL held on March 25, 1987, and all their acts and resolutions made for and in behalf of TORMIL by authority of and pursuant to such invalid appointment & election held on March 25, 1987; 4. Ordering the respondents jointly and severally, to pay the complainants the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P100,000.00) and by way of attorneys fees. [8] Petitioners promptly appealed to the SEC en banc (docketed as SEC-AC No. 339). Thereafter, on 3 April 1991, during the pendency of said appeal, petitioner Manuel A. Torres, Jr. died. However, notice thereof was brought to the attention of the SEC not by petitioners counsel but by private respondents in a Manifestation dated 24 April 1991. [9] On 8 June 1993, petitioners filed a Motion to Suspend Proceedings on grounds that no administrator or legal representative of the late Judge Torres estate has yet been appointed by the Regional Trial Court of Makati where Sp. Proc. No. M-1768 (In Matter of the Issuance of the Last Will and Testament of Manuel A. Torres, Jr.) was pending. Two similar motions for suspension were filed by petitioners on 28 June 1993 and 9 July 1993. On 19 July 1993, the SEC en banc issued an Order denying petitioners aforecited motions on the following ground: Before the filing of these motions, the Commission en banc had already completed all proceedings and had likewise ruled on the merits of the appealed cases. Viewed in this light, we thus feel that there is nothing left to be done except to deny these motions to suspend proceedings. [10] On the same date, the SEC en banc rendered a decision, the dispositive portion of which reads, thus: WHEREFORE, premises considered, the appealed decision of the hearing panel is hereby affirmed and all moti
G.R. No. 117661 - DANIEL VILLANUEVA, TERRY VILLANUEVA-YU, SUSAN VILLANUEVA, EDEN VILLANUEVA AND FRANKIE VILLANUEVA, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS AND BERNARDINO VILLANUEVA.
G.R. No. 117661 -
CaseSY CHIN, SY HEN, TANG TUBI, TANG ANDRES, TANG FELINO, NIEVES KE TEK TANG, ANNIE KE TEK TANG, PENNIE CHUA TANG, LENIE TANG, ZENNIE KE TEK TANG, FELICIA KE TEK TANG, ONG SO HUA, JUDY ALONZO, EDUARDO ALONZO AND ALFREDO ALONZO, VS. THE COURT OF APPEALS, TANG CHING HENG & CO., TANG CHIN HENG AND WILLIAM
G.R. No. 136233 -
CaseG.R. NO. 139448 - JACINTO GALANG, GREGORIA GALANG AND MARISSA GALANG, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, INES CAMAGANAKAN, ANTONIO CAMAGANAKAN, MARITA CAMAGANAKAN AND BELINDA CAMAGANAKAN.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 139448 -