Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is DENIED for lack of merit and the Decision dated May 26, 2008 and Resolution dated December 5, 2008 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 89145 are hereby AFFIRMED .
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is DENIED for lack of merit and the Decision dated May 26, 2008 and Resolution dated December 5, 2008 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 89145 are hereby AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 190143 - SPOUSES LOLITA ORENCIA AND PEDRO D. ORENCIA, VS. FELISA CRUZ VDA. DE RANIN, REPRESENTED BY HER ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, MRS. ESTELA C. TANCHOCO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 190143 -
CaseG.R. No. 187349 - BARANGAY MAYAMOT, ANTIPOLO CITY, VS. ANTIPOLO CITY, SANGGUNIANG PANGLUNGSOD OF ANTIPOLO, BARANGAYS STA. CRUZ, BAGONG NAYON AND MAMBUGAN, AND CITY ASSESSOR AND TREASURER.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 187349 -
CaseG.R. No. 246989 -
G.R. No. 246989 -