Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 245862 -

G.R. No. 245862 - HERMIS CARLOS PEREZ, VS. SANDIGANBAYAN AND THE OMBUDSMAN.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 492,RA 10910,RA 549RA 3019,RA 368RA 188RA 105RA 36,RA 3019RA 354RA 374RA 7160,RA 70RA 613RA 57,RA 6770,RA 618,RA 471RA 149,RA 148
View Original SourceCompare
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , this Office finds probable cause to indict respondent HERMIS C. PEREZ for violation of Section 3(e) of R.A. No.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , this Office finds probable cause to indict respondent HERMIS C. PEREZ for violation of Section 3(e) of R.A. No. 3019. Let the corresponding Information be FILED before the Sandiganbayan. The charges for Malversation of Public Funds or Property and violation of Section 3(g) of R.A. No. 3019 and Sections 37 and 48 [of R.A. No. 9003] against respondent Perez are DISMISSED for lack of merit. The charges against respondent VICTOR G. ROJO are DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.

Related Cases

Case

G.R. No. 239827 - LEONILA PAREDES MONTERO, VS. THE HONORABLE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND AUGUSTIN M. CLORIBEL.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 239827 -

Case

G.R. No. 197567 - GOVERNOR ENRIQUE T. GARCIA, JR., VS. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, LEONARDO B. ROMAN, ROMEO L. MENDIOLA, PASTOR P. VICHUACO, AURORA J. TIAMBENG, AND NUMERIANO G. MEDINA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 197567 -

Case

G.R. No. 231120 - RADAMES F. HERRERA, VS. NOEL P. MAGO, SIMEON B. VILLACRUSIS, AND JOSE R. ASIS, JR..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

G.R. No. 231120 -