TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds and so hold that plaintiffs have proven their case against defendants by preponderance of evidence sufficient to grant what is prayed for in their Complaint with certain modification and hereby renders judgment: 1) Ordering defendants and all persons, natural or juridical, claiming rights, interest or title under them, to vacate and surrender peacefully to plaintiffs that warehouse and the area/premises occupied by them located at No.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court finds and so hold that plaintiffs have proven their case against defendants by preponderance of evidence sufficient to grant what is prayed for in their Complaint with certain modification and hereby renders judgment: 1) Ordering defendants and all persons, natural or juridical, claiming rights, interest or title under them, to vacate and surrender peacefully to plaintiffs that warehouse and the area/premises occupied by them located at No. 883 Santibañez Street corner Cristobal Street, Pandacan, City of Manila; 2) Ordering defendants to pay plaintiff Belgravia the difference of P 20,000.00 from what had been already paid of P 60,000.00 per month for the months of June, 1994 to October, 1994 or a total of P 100,000.00; and the unpaid rentals at P 80,000.00 per month from November, 1994 to the present and until defendants vacate and surrender the warehouse and premises subject of this litigation; 3) Ordering defendants to pay plaintiff P 30,000.00 for and as attorney's fees and expenses of litigation, and 4) To pay the cost of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 147874 - DOLORES GAYOSO, DANNY GAYOSO, ELIZABETH G. DONDRIANO, VICTORIANO GAYOSO, CHRISTOPHER GAYOSO, REMEDIOS GAYOSO AND THE HEIRS OF VICTORIANO GAYOSO, VS. TWENTY-TWO REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 147874 -
CaseG.R. No. 125088 - LAGRIMAS A. BOY, VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ISAGANI P. RAMOS AND ERLINDA GASINGAN RAMOS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 125088 -
CaseG.R. NO. 166875 - DIGNA CONSUMIDO, VS. HON. REYNALDO G. ROS, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF MANILA, BRANCH 33, RAMON SAURA, JR., AND FATIMA SAURA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 166875 -