TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING DISQUISITIONS, the Court finds preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiffs and judgment is hereby rendered: (1) Decreeing the partition of Lot No. 9217-A above-stated in the following mannfer (sic) and proportion of one-fourth (1/4) share each each (sic) of the direct heirs of the late spouses Jayme Morales and Telesfora Garzon, namely: (1) Vicente Morales, who was succeeded by right of representation by his children Ernesto Morales (duly substitu…
WHEREFORE, IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING DISQUISITIONS, the Court finds preponderance of evidence in favor of the plaintiffs and judgment is hereby rendered: (1) Decreeing the partition of Lot No. 9217-A above-stated in the following mannfer (sic) and proportion of one-fourth (1/4) share each each (sic) of the direct heirs of the late spouses Jayme Morales and Telesfora Garzon, namely: (1) Vicente Morales, who was succeeded by right of representation by his children Ernesto Morales (duly substituted by his heirs), Abraham Morales, Angelina Ragasa and Lydia Morales; (2) Simeon Morales, who was succeeded by right of representation by his children Odessa A. Morales, Geraldine Morales Gaspar, Leonides A. Morales and Astrid A. Morales-Agustin; (3) Jose Morales who was succeeded by right of representation by his children, Ronnel Morales, Morales, (sic) Victoria Morales, Vicente Morales, Manuel Morales, Gloria Morales, Virgilio Morales, Amelia Morales and Juliet Morales; (4) Martina Morales, who was succeeded by right of representation by her children, Emeterio Morales-Enriquez, Evelina Morales Enriquez-Lopez, Elizabeth Morales Enriquez-Somera and Bernardita Morales Enriquez-Alojipan; (2) Adjudicating in favor of the above-named heirs by right representation (sic) their respective one-fourth (1/4) share each of the group of heirs by right of representation over the above-stated Lot No. 9217-A; and (3) Ordering the parties to submit their common project of partition of the subject lot with utmost dispatch for approval by the Court; (4) To pay the cost of the suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 122249 - REYNALDO, TELESFORO, REMEDIOS, ALFREDO AND BELEN, ALL SURNAMED AGUIRRE, VICENTA, HORACIO AND FLORENCIO, ALL SURNAMED MAGTIBAY AND LEONILA, CECILIA, ANTONIO, AND VENANCIO, ALL SURNAMED MEDRANO, AND ZOSIMA QUIAMBAO, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND ELIAS, JOSE, ARSENIA AND ROGELIO, ALL SURNA
G.R. No. 122249 -
CaseG.R. No. 170115 - PROVINCE OF CEBU, vs. HEIRS OF RUFINA MORALES, NAMELY: FELOMINA V. PANOPIO, NENITA VILLANUEVA, ERLINDA V. ADRIANO and CATALINA V. QUESADA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 170115 -
CaseG.R. No. 168692 - FRANCISCO TAYCO, SUBSTITUTED BY LUCRESIA TAYCO AND NOEL TAYCO, VS. HEIRS OF CONCEPCION TAYCO-FLORES, NAMELY: LUCELI F. DIAZ, RONELE F. BESA, MONELE FLORES, PERLA FLORES, RUPERTO FLORES, WENCESLAO FLORES, PURISIMA FLORES, AND FELIPE FLORES. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 168692 -