Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, viewed from the foregoing facts and considerations, this office declares the dismissal of the complainant not in accordance with law. Hence, respondent is hereby ordered: "1. To immediately reinstate Complainant to her former position as security guard without prejudice to reassignment in the exigency of the service, with full backwages from the time she was placed under preventive suspension on October 27, 1989 up to the time of her reinstatement. "2.
WHEREFORE, viewed from the foregoing facts and considerations, this office declares the dismissal of the complainant not in accordance with law. Hence, respondent is hereby ordered: "1. To immediately reinstate Complainant to her former position as security guard without prejudice to reassignment in the exigency of the service, with full backwages from the time she was placed under preventive suspension on October 27, 1989 up to the time of her reinstatement. "2. To pay the salary of the Complainant for October, 1989. "3. To pay Complainant the adjusted salary differential for services rendered for the period January 1 to May 25, 1989, May 26 to August 25, 1989, August 26 to September 30, 1989 under R.A. 6640; and salary differentials under R.A. 6727 for work rendered covering July 6, 1989 to October 28, 1989 in the aggregate total of P 15,523.48. "Other claims are denied for lack of merit. "SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 124013 - ROSARIO MANEJA, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND MANILA MIDTOWN HOTEL.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 124013 -
CaseG.R. No. 117040 - RUBEN SERRANO, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND ISETANN DEPARTMENT STORE.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 117040 -
CaseG.R. NO. 162850 - MAXI SECURITY AND DETECTIVE AGENCY, REPRESENTED BY ITS OWNER ROLANDO P. OCHOA, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION, AND GERMAN GUSI.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 162850 -