Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the appealed decision is hereby affirmed with certain modifications, to wit: a) directing and ordering defendant-appellant to vacate the premises of the 2 lots subject matter of this case and to deliver the possession thereof in (sic) the plaintiffs-appellees, including all the improvements introduced by the defendant-appellant thereon like the buildings which improvements are now owned by the appellees pursuant to and by the operation of the terms and conditions of paragraph (3) of t…
WHEREFORE, the appealed decision is hereby affirmed with certain modifications, to wit: a) directing and ordering defendant-appellant to vacate the premises of the 2 lots subject matter of this case and to deliver the possession thereof in (sic) the plaintiffs-appellees, including all the improvements introduced by the defendant-appellant thereon like the buildings which improvements are now owned by the appellees pursuant to and by the operation of the terms and conditions of paragraph (3) of the written contract that expired on December 15, 1991; b) directing and ordering defendant-appellant to pay plaintiffs-appellees the amount of Fourteen Thousand Pesos (P14,000.00) as monthly rental starting from December 16, 1991 until defendant-appellant shall have vacated the leased premises, crediting in favor of the defendant-appellant the amounts received by the plaintiffs-appellees as rental through the sheriff, which amounts are the amounts deposited with the court and the proceeds of the writ of execution pending appeal; c) directing and ordering defendant-appellant to pay plaintiffs-appellees the amount of Seven Thousand Pesos (P7,000.00) as attorneys fees and Three Thousand Pesos (P3,000.00) as expenses of litigation; and d) with costs against the defendant-appellant. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 119107 - JOSE V. LAGON, VS. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS AND MENANDRO V. LAPUZ.
G.R. NO. 119107 -
CaseG.R. No. 183645 - HEIRS OF GAMALIEL ALBANO, REPRESENTED BY ALEXANDER ALBANO AND ALL OTHER PERSON LIVING WITH THEM IN THE SUBJECT PREMISES, VS. SPS. MENA C. RAVANES AND ROBERTO RA VANES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 183645 -
CaseG.R. No. 138955 - AMPARO ROXAS, VS. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, AND MANOTOK REALTY, INC..D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 138955 -