Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, IN THE LIGHT OF ALL THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS, JUDGMENT is hereby rendered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, by: "1. Ordering the dismissal of the Complaint; and "2. Declaring Laguna Provincial Tax Ordinance No. 01-92 as valid, binding, reasonable and enforceable.
WHEREFORE, IN THE LIGHT OF ALL THE FOREGOING CONSIDERATIONS, JUDGMENT is hereby rendered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, by: "1. Ordering the dismissal of the Complaint; and "2. Declaring Laguna Provincial Tax Ordinance No. 01-92 as valid, binding, reasonable and enforceable." [2] In the instant petition, MERALCO assails the above ruling and brings up the following issues; viz : "1. Whether the imposition of a franchise tax under Section 2.09 of Laguna Provincial Ordinance No. 01-92, insofar as petitioner is concerned , is violative of the non-impairment clause of the Constitution and Section 1 of Presidential Decree No. 551. "2. Whether Republic Act. No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, has repealed, amended or modified Presidential Decree No. 551. "3. Whether the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies is applicable in this case." [3] The petition lacks merit. Prefatorily, it might be well to recall that local governments do not have the inherent power to tax [4] except to the extent that such power might be delegated to them either by the basic law or by statute. Presently, under Article X of the 1987 Constitution, a general delegation of that power has been given in favor of local government units. Thus: "Sec. 3. The Congress shall enact a local government code which shall provide for a more responsive and accountable local government structure instituted through a system of decentralization with effective mechanisms of recall, initiative, and referendum, allocate among the different local government units their powers, responsibilities, and resources, and provide for the qualifications, election, appointment and removal, term, salaries, powers and functions, and duties of local officials, and all other matters relating to the organization and operation of the local units. "x x x x x x x x x "Sec. 5. Each local government shall have the power to create its own sources of revenues and to levy taxes, fees, and charges subject to such guidelines and limitations as the Congress may provide, consistent with the basic policy of local autonomy. Such taxes, fees and charges shall accrue exclusively to the local governments." The 1987 Constitution has a counterpart provision in the 1973 Constitution which did come out with a similar delegation of revenue making powers to local governments. [5] Under the regime of the 1935 Constitution no similar delegation of tax powers was provided, and local government units instead derived their tax powers under a limited statutory authority. Whereas, then, the delegation of tax powers granted at that time by statute to local governments was confined and defined (outside of which the power was deemed withheld), the present constitutional rule (starting with the 1973 Constitution), however, would broadly confer such tax powers subject only to specific exceptions that the law might prescribe. Under the now prevailing Constitution , where there is neither a gr
G.R. No. 198529 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, VS. CITY OF MUNTINLUPA AND NELIA A. BARLIS.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 198529 -
CaseG.R. No. 181710 - CITY OF PASIG AND CRISPINA V. SALUMBRE, IN HER CAPACITY AS OIC-CITY TREASURER OF PASIG CITY, VS. MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 181710 -
CaseG.R. No. 120082 - MACTAN CEBU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, VS. HON. FERDINAND J. MARCOS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 20, CEBU CITY, THE CITY OF CEBU, REPRESENTED BY ITS MAYOR, HON. TOMAS R. OSMEÑA, AND EUSTAQUIO B. CESA.
G.R. No. 120082 -