Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 149984 -

SPOUSES ROLANDO M. ZOSA AND LUISA Y. ZOSA, VS. HON. SANTIAGO ESTRELLA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF PASIG CITY, BRANCH 67, CHINATRUST (PHILS.) COMMERCIAL BANK CORPORATION, NOTARY PUBLIC JAIME P. PORTUGAL, THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR PASIG CITY, AND CHAILEASE FINANCE CORP

Cited Laws

RA 151
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petitions for review on certiorari are DENIED . SO ORDERED . Ynares-Santiago, (Chairperson), Austria-Martinez, Chico-Nazario, and Reyes, JJ. , concur.

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petitions for review on certiorari are DENIED . SO ORDERED . Ynares-Santiago, (Chairperson), Austria-Martinez, Chico-Nazario, and Reyes, JJ. , concur. [1] Rollo (G.R. No. 154991), p. 77. [2] Id. at 78. [3] Id. at 49. [4] Id. at 81-83. [5] Id. at 85-86. [6] Id. at 87-92. [7] Rollo (G.R. No. 149984), p. 186. [8] Id. at 187. [9] Id. at 188-189. [10] Id. at 169, 221. [11] Supra note 7. [12] Supra note 8. [13] Supra note 9. [14] Supra notes 7 to 9. [15] Rollo (G.R. No. 149984), pp. 166 and 223. [16] Penned by Associate Justice Martin S. Villarama, with Associate Justices Conrado M. Vasquez, Jr. (now Presiding Justice of the appellate court) and Sergio L. Pestaño, concurring; id. at 19-25. [17] The dispositive portion of the June 22, 2001 Decision reads: WHEREFORE, premises considered, the present petition is hereby DENIED DUE COURSE and accordingly DISMISSED, for lack of merit. Consequently, the assailed Orders dated June 26, 2000, August 21, 2000 and November 23, 2000 of the respondent judge in Civil Case No. 67620 , entitled " Spouses Rolando M. Zosa and Luisa Zosa v. ChinaTrust (Phils.) Commercial Bank Corporation and Notary Public Jaime Portugal for Pasig City ," are all hereby AFFIRMED and REITERATED. Costs against the petitioners. SO ORDERED.