Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 250439 -

G.R. No. 250439 - FIL-EXPAT PLACEMENT AGENCY, INC., VS. MARIA ANTONIETTE CUDAL LEE.R E S O L U T I O N - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 8042RA 10022
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, respondents are found guilty of breach of contract and constructive dismissal. Accordingly, respondents, except Mark Amielle De Ocampo, are hereby ordered to jointly and severally pay complainant the following: (a) salary equivalent to [the] unexpired portion of her contract from June 23, 2016 to December 3, 2017 at its peso equivalent at the time of payment; (b) unpaid salary of 14,666 SR at its peso equivalent at the time of payment; (c) refund of placement fee…

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , premises considered, respondents are found guilty of breach of contract and constructive dismissal. Accordingly, respondents, except Mark Amielle De Ocampo, are hereby ordered to jointly and severally pay complainant the following: (a) salary equivalent to [the] unexpired portion of her contract from June 23, 2016 to December 3, 2017 at its peso equivalent at the time of payment; (b) unpaid salary of 14,666 SR at its peso equivalent at the time of payment; (c) refund of placement fee in the amount of 3,637.75 SR[;] (d) cost of transporting her personal belongings amounting to 3,560 SR at its peso equivalent at the time of payment; (e) moral damages of P20,000.00; (f) exemplary damages of P10,000.00; (g) attorney's fees equivalent to 10% of the total award; and (h) interest of 6% per annum reckoned from the finality of this Decision. SO ORDERED.