Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby REVERSED. Respondent Cottonway Marketing Corporation is hereby ordered to reinstate the complainants without loss of seniority rights and other privileges and to pay them the following: (1) their proportionate 13th month pay for 1994; and (2) their full backwages inclusive of allowances and other benefits, or their monetary equivalent computed from the time their salaries were withheld from them up to the date of their actual reinstatement.
WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby REVERSED. Respondent Cottonway Marketing Corporation is hereby ordered to reinstate the complainants without loss of seniority rights and other privileges and to pay them the following: (1) their proportionate 13th month pay for 1994; and (2) their full backwages inclusive of allowances and other benefits, or their monetary equivalent computed from the time their salaries were withheld from them up to the date of their actual reinstatement. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 170416 - UNIVERSITY PLANS INCORPORATED, VS. BELINDA P. SOLANO, TERRY A. LAMUG, GLENDA S. BELGA, MELBA S. ALVAREZ, WELMA R. NAMATA, MARIETTA D. BACHO AND MANOLO L. CENIDO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 170416 -
CaseG.R. No. 167332 - FILIPINAS PALMOIL PROCESSING, INC. AND DENNIS T. VILLAREAL, VS. JOEL P. DEJAPA, REPRESENTED BY HIS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT MYRNA MANZANO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 167332 -
CaseG.R. No. 206331 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE (DARMPC), VS. CARMENCITA DIAZ, REPRESENTED BY MARY CATHERINE M. DIAZ; EMMA CABIGTING; AND NINA T. SAMANIEGO[1].DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 206331 -