Back to Search
JurisprudenceG.R. No. 241353 -

G.R. No. 241353 - DANILO ROMERO, VICTORIO ROMERO AND EL ROMERO, REPRESENTING THEIR DECEASED FATHER LUTERO ROMERO, VS. CRISPINA SOMBRINO.DECISION - Supreme Court E-Library

Cited Laws

RA 11231RA 2263RA 3844,RA 3844RA 1199,
Share:

TL;DR — Ruling

WHEREFORE , foregoing premises considered, decision is hereby rendered as follows[:] Declaring complainant Crispina Sombrino to be a de jure tenant and ordering her reinstatement to the subject landholding[;] Ordering herein respondents and/or any person in occupation/possession of the subject landholding to vacate and turn-over its possession to the complainant; Directing the MARO, DAR of Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte to execute an agricultural leasehold contract between the herein parties pursuan…

Decision

Ruling

WHEREFORE , foregoing premises considered, decision is hereby rendered as follows[:] Declaring complainant Crispina Sombrino to be a de jure tenant and ordering her reinstatement to the subject landholding[;] Ordering herein respondents and/or any person in occupation/possession of the subject landholding to vacate and turn-over its possession to the complainant; Directing the MARO, DAR of Kapatagan, Lanao del Norte to execute an agricultural leasehold contract between the herein parties pursuant to DAR A.O. No. 5, Series of 1993[;] All other claims are denied for lack of basis . SO ORDERED.