Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered finding respondents [herein petitioners] liable for illegal dismissal and payment of money claims. Accordingly, respondents [herein petitioners] are hereby ordered to reinstate complainant to her position without loss of seniority rights and other benefits, and to pay the following: 1.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered finding respondents [herein petitioners] liable for illegal dismissal and payment of money claims. Accordingly, respondents [herein petitioners] are hereby ordered to reinstate complainant to her position without loss of seniority rights and other benefits, and to pay the following: 1. Complainants full backwages, computed from the time she was illegally dismissed to the date of her actual reinstatement, which as of date amounts to P185,380.00; 2. Prorated 13 th month pay in the sum of P4,166.00; 3. Salaries for period of February 16-28, 2007 amounting to P13,000.00; 4. 10% of the total award as attorneys fee. The reinstatement aspect of this Decision is immediately executory pursuant to Article 223 of the Labor Code, as amended. Respondents [herein petitioners] are therefore directed to submit a report of compliance thereof before this Office within ten (10) calendar days from receipt hereof. All other claims are hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. No. 131552 - ARSENIO V. VILLA, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (FIRST DIVISION), OCEAN-LINK CONTAINER TERMINAL CENTER, BENJAMIN S. TAN AND VICTORIA ACORDA. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 131552 -
CaseG.R. No. 172628 - COATS MANILA BAY, INC., VS. PURITA M. ORTEGA (REPRESENTED BY ALEJANDRO SAN PEDRO, JR.) AND MARINA A. MONTERO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 172628 -
CaseG.R. No. 187491 - FAR EAST BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, VS. LILIA S. CHUA.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 187491 -