Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is denied due course and is accordingly DISMISSED .” [4] The assailed Resolution, on the other hand, denied petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration. The Facts The CA narrated the facts as follows: “Private respondent Roberto J. Cuenca is the registered owner of a parcel of land designated as Lot No.
WHEREFORE , premises considered, the petition is denied due course and is accordingly DISMISSED . [4] The assailed Resolution, on the other hand, denied petitioners Motion for Reconsideration. The Facts The CA narrated the facts as follows: Private respondent Roberto J. Cuenca is the registered owner of a parcel of land designated as Lot No. 816-A and covered by TCT No. 1084, containing an area of 81.6117 hectares, situated in Brgy. Haguimit, La Carlota City and devoted principally to the planting of sugar cane. On 21 September 1999, Noe Fortunado, Municipal Agrarian Reform Officer (MARO) of La Carlota City issued and sent a NOTICE OF COVERAGE to private respondent Cuenca placing the above-described landholding under the compulsory coverage of R.A. 6657, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). The NOTICE OF COVERAGE also stated that the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) will determine the value of the subject land pursuant to Executive Order No. 405 dated 14 June 1990. On 29 September 1999, private respondent Cuenca filed with the Regional Trial Court, Branch 63, La Carlota City, a complaint against Noe Fortunado and Land Bank of the Philippines for Annulment of Notice of Coverage and Declaration of Unconstitutionality of E.O. No. 405, Series of 1990, With Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order. The case was docketed as Civil Case No. 713. In his complaint, Cuenca alleged, inter alia , that the implementation of CARP in his landholding is no longer with authority of law considering that, if at all, the implementation should have commenced and should have been completed between June 1988 to June 1992, as provided in the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL); that the placing of the subject landholding under CARP is without the imprimatur of the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) and the Provincial Agrarian Reform Coordinating Committee (PARCOM) as required by R.A. 7905; that Executive Order No. 405 dated 14 June 1990 amends, modifies and/or repeals CARL and, therefore, it is unconstitutional considering that on 14 June 1990, then President Corazon Aquino no longer had law-making powers; that the NOTICE OF COVERAGE is a gross violation of PD 399 dated 28 February 1974. Private respondent Cuenca prayed that the Notice of Coverage be declared null and void ab initio and Executive Order No. 405 dated 14 June 1990 be declared unconstitutional. On 05 October 1999, MARO Noe Fortunado filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court a quo has no jurisdiction over the nature and subject matter of the action, pursuant to R.A. 6657. On 12 January 2000, the respondent Judge issued a Temporary Restraining Order directing MARO and LBP to cease and desist from implementing the Notice of Coverage. In the same order, the respondent Judge set the hearing on the application for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction on January 17 and 18, 2000. On 14 January 2000, MARO Fortunado
G.R. No. 101932 - FRANCISCO H. ESCAÑO, JR. AND LYDIA T. ESCAÑO, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 101932 -
CaseG.R. No. 176549 - DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, QUEZON CITY & PABLO MENDOZA, VS. ROMEO C. CARRIEDO.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 176549 -
CaseEMERSON B. BAGONGAHASA, GIRLIE B. BAGONGAHASA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM - PROVINCIAL AGRARIAN REFORM OFFICER OF LAGUNA, AND REGISTER OF DEEDS OF SINOLOAN, LAGUNA, VS. JOHANNA L. ROMUALDEZ.
G.R. No. 179844 -