Cited Laws
TL;DR — Ruling
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing findings and legal premises, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and ordering the defendant to pay the former: PhP 1,282,481.83 as balance for the rental fees of the subject heavy equipments (sic) as of April 30, 2002, inclusive of the interests thereof; Twenty-Five percent (25%) of the total amount to be recovered as payment for the attorney's fees; and, The costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing findings and legal premises, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and ordering the defendant to pay the former: PhP 1,282,481.83 as balance for the rental fees of the subject heavy equipments (sic) as of April 30, 2002, inclusive of the interests thereof; Twenty-Five percent (25%) of the total amount to be recovered as payment for the attorney's fees; and, The costs of suit. SO ORDERED.
G.R. NO. 160242 - ASIAN CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND MONARK EQUIPMENT CORPORATION. D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. NO. 160242 -
CaseG.R. No. 202989 - COMGLASCO CORPORATION/AGUILA GLASS, VS. SANTOS CAR CHECK CENTER CORPORATION.D E C I S I O N - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 202989 -
CaseG.R. No. 140630 - YUSUKE FUKUZUMI, VS. SANRITSU GREAT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, TETSUJI MARUYAMA, AKIRA KUBOTA, YUKIO MATSUZAKA.RESOLUTION - Supreme Court E-Library
G.R. No. 140630 -